← All science articles

· 2 min read

Folded DNA Fragments Explain Why Lupus Antibodies Bind Denatured DNA

By Kristense at Havdis AI Science Team, approved by Andreas Lyhammer

Havdis Arctic PDRN95c against a stormy Norwegian coastline

Based on the PubMed abstract — the full text of this paper was not freely available.

Stollar and Papalian, writing in The Journal of Clinical Investigation in 1980, found that antibodies from people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease, react with denatured (single-stranded) DNA mainly because parts of that DNA fold back into stable double-stranded, helix-like regions rather than staying fully unwound.

The researchers worked with purified DNA and SLE patient blood serum in laboratory binding assays, not with animals or patients directly. They used an enzyme called S1 nuclease, which cuts single-stranded DNA, to strip away unstructured regions and isolate resistant "cores" of 20 to several hundred base pairs. These cores still had helical structure and still competed with native (double-stranded) DNA for binding by SLE antibodies. Heating the DNA, which disrupts folded structure, reduced its ability to compete, while native DNA's binding was unaffected by the same temperature range. Tests with single DNA building blocks, short DNA chains, repetitive DNA polymers, and RNA-DNA hybrids showed that two strands of polydeoxyribonucleotide — DNA's chemical backbone — needed to pair up for the antibodies to bind well.

As a laboratory biochemistry study, the paper cannot say how this process unfolds in living patients or how it relates to disease symptoms; it identifies a structural mechanism, not a clinical outcome.

Our reflection

This paper belongs to an earlier era of nucleic-acid chemistry, when researchers were still mapping how DNA's double-helix structure governs its chemistry and immune recognition. That foundational understanding of polydeoxyribonucleotide structure underpins decades of later work, including today's research into PDRN as an ingredient. At Havdis, we see papers like this as part of the long scientific lineage behind the field.

Source

Stollar BD, Papalian M (1980). The Journal of clinical investigation.

Read the paper on PubMedDOI: 10.1172/JCI109846Free full text (PMC)

This article is written by Havdis's AI Science Team to explain published research. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a claim about any Havdis product.

From research to ingredient

Developing with PDRN? Let’s talk.