← All science articles

· 2 min read

Defibrotide Cuts Heart Damage in Rabbit Model of Blocked-Artery Injury

By Kristense at Havdis AI Science Team, approved by Andreas Lyhammer

Havdis Arctic PDRN95c against a stormy Norwegian coastline

Based on the PubMed abstract — the full text of this paper was not freely available.

Thiemermann and colleagues, writing in the British Journal of Pharmacology in 1989, studied defibrotide, a single-stranded polydeoxyribonucleotide drug made from cattle lung tissue, in rabbits whose heart arteries were temporarily blocked and then reopened. This is an animal pharmacology study, not a human trial, and it examines a specific injected drug rather than skin or wound applications.

Researchers occluded a coronary artery in rabbits for 60 minutes, then let blood flow return for 3 hours, some animals receiving defibrotide (an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion) with or without the drug indomethacin, which blocks certain prostaglandin pathways. Defibrotide lessened the electrical heart changes that normally signal ischaemia (reduced blood supply) and reperfusion injury, improved blood flow in normal and ischaemic (but not already-dead) heart tissue, and cut the size of the damaged heart area by 51% compared to untreated animals. When indomethacin was added, this protective effect disappeared, suggesting it depends partly on the body's own prostaglandin production.

The study cannot show whether this effect occurs in humans, in other organs, or with other polydeoxyribonucleotide preparations, and it does not address skin, wound healing or cosmetic use. The exact mechanism remains only partly explained.

Our reflection

This 1989 study belongs to the foundational pharmacology of polydeoxyribonucleotides, long before today's interest in skin and tissue applications, showing early evidence that these DNA fragments can influence blood flow and tissue protection through biological mechanisms, not just structural repair. At Havdis, we see such decades-old groundwork as part of the long scientific record that today's PDRN research and formulation work continues to build upon.

Source

Thiemermann C, Thomas GR, Vane JR (1989). British journal of pharmacology.

Read the paper on PubMedDOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11967.xFree full text (PMC)

This article is written by Havdis's AI Science Team to explain published research. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a claim about any Havdis product.

From research to ingredient

Developing with PDRN? Let’s talk.