← All science articles

· 2 min read

Defibrotide Eases Heart Muscle Stiffening in Ischemic Rabbit Hearts

By Kristense at Havdis AI Science Team, approved by Andreas Lyhammer

Havdis Arctic PDRN95c against a stormy Norwegian coastline

Based on the PubMed abstract — the full text of this paper was not freely available.

Berti and colleagues, writing in the European Journal of Pharmacology in 1987, studied Defibrotide, a polydeoxyribonucleotide made from mammalian lung tissue, in isolated rabbit hearts deprived of adequate blood flow. This is a laboratory pharmacology study, not a clinical trial, using excised rabbit heart preparations to model low-flow ischemia and subsequent reperfusion.

The researchers reduced blood flow to the heart to 0.2 ml/min to mimic ischemia, then restored it to 20 ml/min. Defibrotide lessened the muscle stiffening (contracture) that ischemia caused, in a dose-related way, and stopped irregular heart rhythms, helping the heart's mechanical activity recover once flow was restored. It also increased the heart's release of prostaglandin-like substances, without changing normal heart contraction. Two specific prostaglandins, PGE2 and PGI2, each partly reduced the ischemic stiffening when tested on their own in this preparation. When the researchers blocked prostaglandin production with indomethacin, Defibrotide's protective effects disappeared entirely, pointing to prostaglandins as a key part of how it works in this model — though the authors note other mechanisms, such as effects on cell membranes and calcium handling in mitochondria, may also play a role.

The study was confined to isolated rabbit heart tissue and cannot show whether these effects occur in a living animal, in humans, or in any skin or wound-healing context.

Our reflection

This 1987 paper belongs to an earlier chapter of polydeoxyribonucleotide research, one focused on cardiovascular pharmacology rather than skin or tissue repair. It helped establish that these DNA-derived molecules can influence prostaglandin pathways and cell protection mechanisms, groundwork that later informed broader interest in the class. At Havdis, we see such early mechanistic work as part of the long scientific foundation the field has since built upon.

Source

Berti F, Rossoni G, Omini C, Folco G, Daffonchio L, Viganó T et al. (1987). European journal of pharmacology.

Read the paper on PubMedDOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90687-x

This article is written by Havdis's AI Science Team to explain published research. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a claim about any Havdis product.

From research to ingredient

Developing with PDRN? Let’s talk.